London +4420 814 42225
Moscow +7495 543 9194
Kiev +38044 599 2950
info@mrcplast.com

Our Clients

Order Informer

 
Home > News >
 

US film and bag recycling grew double-digit   2  

February 10/2012

(chemnet) -- Plastic film and bag recycling in the US is on the increase, jumping 14% in 2010 to 971.8 million pounds, according to a new report.

The annual increase is the first of more than 3% since 2006. "We are excited about the dramatic jump, said Keith Christman, managing director of plastics markets for the American Chemistry Council (ACC).

"The communication is getting out that plastic bags can be recycled. A lot more bags have messages on them that say bring it back, he said. However, Mark Murray, executive director of Californians Against Waste, said the percentage increase was misleading.

"By every measure, plastic bags remain a recycling failure, Murray said. "The reported growth in plastic bag recycling volume of 27 million pounds from 2009 to 2010 was completely swamped by the Environmental Protection Agencys reported 220 million pound growth in plastic bag generation during the same period, he said.


"The volume of plastic bags generated and disposed grew by a substantially greater volume than recycling in 2010, Murray added.

The amount of plastic bags and film collected in 2010 jumped 14% from nearly 854.4 million to 971.8 million pounds in 2010, according to data compiled by Moore Recycling Associates and released by ACC yesterday.

By comparison, the cumulative percentage increase the previous three years was just 5.2%, with yearly individual increases of 2.24% in 2007, 0.25% in 2008 and 2.64% in 2009.

mrcplast.com

Author:Anna Larionova
Tags:PE, cellulose.
Category:General News
|
| More

All comments

Sort by: date | rating
  • Patty Moore 14.02.2012 01:22:10
    •  
    • -1
    •  
    Mark Murray, Executive Director of Californians Against Waste, uses very misleading facts and figures in his attempt to downplay the positive news in the recent National Postconsumer Plastic Bag and Film Recycling Report. If Mr Murray was genuinely interested in reducing waste he would help recycling efforts by promoting the opportunity to recover so very many recyclable household items such as toilet paper wrap and bread bagsthanks to the infrastructure provided by retailers across the country to collect bags. An infrastructure that, unlike curbside, does not cost communities anything and is a benefit to the retail community as well. The majority of grocers voluntarily collect bags and wraps from their customers and combine it with their back-of-the store pallet wrap. This high-quality product is being purchased by domestic reclaimers, diverting valuable resources from disposal and creating jobs.<br /> <br /> The figures Mr. Murray uses in his press release about the National Postconsumer Plastic Bag and Film Recycling Report misdirect the readers. It is true there was an increase in film and bag generation from 2009 to 2010 according to the EPA figures, but the increase of ALL bags, sacks and wraps was only 16o million pounds and the increase in recycling was 220 million pounds. And, over a three year period (2008 - 2010) recycling gains are even more impressive. According to the EPA data, recycling of bags, sacks and wraps grew by 530 million pounds, while sales of the same decreased by 60 million pounds (Wraps grew over the three year period, but Bags and Sacks sales actually dropped 340 million pounds). The EPA data, clearly shows that film recycling is making significant gains! The retail infrastructure for collecting bags, which allows for the collection of consumer sacks and wrap as well, is making these recycling gains possible.<br /> <br /> Mr. Murray questions Moore Recycling Associates methodology to determine the amount of bags recovered by referencing a CSUS study: a study which calls the validity of its own data into question several times. As stated in the National Postconsumer Plastic Bag and Film Recycling Report, Moore Recycling selected the most conservative percentage of bags mixed with wraps that were reported by the companies that buy and process millions of pounds of retail-generated material from all across the country. A mixed film bale with only 6% bag material would be either a premium grade bale with a high percent of wrap, or a really bad bale with an extreme level of contamination. And note that the 6% he referenced was only for complying bags, a very narrow California-specific definition.<br /> <br /> But more important than clarifying Mr Murrays inveigled figures, is to acknowledge the fact that we saw growth in the domestic processing of recovered film and bag material. Domestic reclaimers reported increases in all grades of film. More material was processed in the US or Canada than was sold to overseas markets, which is a significant reversal in the trend seen over the past several years. The sustainability of our infrastructure to manage our resources domestically depends on a steady supply of quality material. The retail infrastructure for collecting bagswhich allows for the collection of consumer sacks and wrap as wellis making these recycling gains possible.<br /> <br /> Respectfully submitted,<br /> Patty Moore, Nina Butler & Stacey Luddy<br />
  • Patty Moore 15.02.2012 22:00:38
    •  
    • 0
    •  
    My apologies it should say that recycling grew by 120 M pounds over a three year period.<br />

Leave a comment

MRC help

 


 All News   News subscribe